English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94286/110023 (86%)
Visitors : 21693072      Online Users : 878
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    ASIA unversity > 管理學院 > 經營管理學系  > 期刊論文 >  Item 310904400/8596


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/8596


    Title: Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships
    Authors: Yang, Jiann Liang;Chiu, Huan Neng;Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung;Yeh, Ruey Huei
    Contributors: Department of Business Administration
    Keywords: vendor selection;multiple criteria decision making (MCDM);independence;interdependence;non-additive fuzzy integral;MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MODEL;SUPPLIER SELECTION;PERSPECTIVE;CRITERIA;RANKING
    Date: 2008-11
    Issue Date: 2010-03-26 03:15:14 (UTC+0)
    Publisher: Asia University
    Abstract: Vendor selection is an evaluation process that is based on many criteria that uses inaccurate or uncertain data. But while the criteria are often numerous and the relationships between higher-level criteria and lower-level sub-criteria are complex, most conventional decision models cannot help us clarify the interrelationships among the sub-criteria. Our proposed integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) method addresses this issue within the context of the vendor selection problem. First. we use triangular fuzzy numbers to express the subjective preferences of evaluators. Second. we use interpretive structural modeling (ISM) to map out the relationships among the sub-criteria. Third, we use the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method to compute the relative weights for each criterion, and we use non-additive fuzzy integral to obtain the fuzzy synthetic performance of each common criterion. Fourth, the best vendor is determined according to the overall aggregating score of each vendor using the fuzzy weights with fuzzy synthetic Utilities. Fifth, we use an empirical example to show that our proposed method is preferred to the traditional method. especially when the sub-criteria are interdependent. Finally, our results provide valuable suggestions to vendors on how to improve each SUb-criterion so that they can bridge the gap between actual and aspired performance values in the future. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Relation: INFORMATION SCIENCES,178(21):4166-4183.
    Appears in Collections:[經營管理學系 ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    399.docx0KbUnknown574View/Open
    399.doc37KbMicrosoft Word663View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback