| Abstract: | The most notable for being a waste in dental health insurance is the re-implant for Prosthodontics, according to the health insurance database, a large percentage of dental expenses to national main medical expenses is 78.76%, above all, Prosthodontics expenses come up with a 51.18% to medical expenses.
Therefore this report will be discussed the longevity of dental restoration failure rate with meta-analysis for dental filler with composite resin in permanent teeth, permanent cervical teeth, and primary teeth.
To access researching in the MEDLINE medical databank, to analysis and to retrieve the article for Prosthodontics. To integrate data with CMA (Comprehensive Meta Analysis) Version 2.0.
According to test reports, the survival rate for composite resin in permanent teeth at 95% confidence interval 93.3% ( 91.7% - 94.7%) the first year, 92.4% ( 91% - 93.6%) the second year, 90.2% ( 88.8% - 91.5%) the third year, 90.7% ( 88.9% - 91.2% ) the fourth year, 90.5% ( 89.3% - 91.6%) the fifth year.
The survival rate for composite resin in permanent cervical teeth at 95% confidence interval 87.7% ( 85.5% - 89.6%) the first year, 84.1% ( 80.5% - 87.1%) the second year, 86.9% ( 82.9% - 90.2%) the third year, 83%( 80.7% - 95.7%) the fifth year.
The survival rate for composite resin in primary teeth at 95% confidence interval 93.7% ( 91.9% - 95.2%) the first year, 88.7% ( 86.2% - 90.8%) the second year, 89.9% ( 77.6% - 95.8%) the third year.
This report works as a backgrounder for the longevity of dental restoration failure rate overseas in taking composite resin as dental filler, to be treated as a benchmark to help audit the fee schedule, reappraise the rational of health care fee point. |
