ASIA unversity:Item 310904400/8752
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94286/110023 (86%)
Visitors : 21656715      Online Users : 188
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/8752


    Title: Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships
    Authors: Yang, Jiann Liang;Chiu, Huan Neng;Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung;Yeh, Ruey Huei
    Contributors: Department of Business Administration
    Keywords: Chlorine compounds;Food additives;Fuzzy sets;Problem solving -Analytical Hierarchy Process;Decision modeling;Evaluation processes;Fuzzy integrals;Fuzzy MCDM;Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making;Fuzzy weights;Independence;Interdependence;Interpretive Structural Modeling;Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM);Non-additive;Non-additive fuzzy integral;Relative weights;Triangular fuzzy numbers;Uncertain data;Vendor selection
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2010-04-08 10:54:04 (UTC+0)
    Publisher: Asia University
    Abstract: Vendor selection is an evaluation process that is based on many criteria that uses inaccurate or uncertain data. But while the criteria are often numerous and the relationships between higher-level criteria and lower-level sub-criteria are complex, most conventional decision models cannot help us clarify the interrelationships among the sub-criteria. Our proposed integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) method addresses this issue within the context of the vendor selection problem. First, we use triangular fuzzy numbers to express the subjective preferences of evaluators. Second, we use interpretive structural modeling (ISM) to map out the relationships among the sub-criteria. Third, we use the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method to compute the relative weights for each criterion, and we use non-additive fuzzy integral to obtain the fuzzy synthetic performance of each common criterion. Fourth, the best vendor is determined according to the overall aggregating score of each vendor using the fuzzy weights with fuzzy synthetic utilities. Fifth, we use an empirical example to show that our proposed method is preferred to the traditional method, especially when the sub-criteria are interdependent. Finally, our results provide valuable suggestions to vendors on how to improve each sub-criterion so that they can bridge the gap between actual and aspired performance values in the future.
    Relation: Information Science 178:4166-4183
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Business Administration] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown696View/Open
    185.doc30KbMicrosoft Word431View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback