English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94286/110023 (86%)
Visitors : 21651878      Online Users : 525
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/81317


    Title: Effect of Tilt and Recline on Ischial and Coccygeal Interface Pressures in People with Spinal Cord Injury
    Authors: Chen Y;Wang J;Lung CW;Yang TD;Crane BA;Jan YK
    Contributors: 創意商品設計學系
    Date: 2014
    Issue Date: 2014-10-08 06:00:56 (UTC+0)
    Abstract: OBJECTIVE:
    Clinicians commonly recommend that power wheelchair users with spinal cord injury perform wheelchair tilt and recline maneuvers to redistribute seating loads away from the ischial tuberosities. However, ischial pressure reduction may be accompanied by coccygeal pressure increases. Although the coccyx is among the most common sites of pressure ulcers, few studies have reported coccygeal interface pressure. The purpose of this study was to investigate both ischial and coccygeal interface pressures in response to changes in wheelchair tilt and recline angles.
    DESIGN:
    Thirteen power wheelchair users were recruited into this study. Six combinations of wheelchair tilt (15, 25, and 35 degrees) and recline (10 and 30 degrees, corresponding to traditional recline conventions of 100 and 120 degrees, respectively) angles were tested in random order. Each combination was tested with 5 mins of upright sitting, 5 mins of tilt and recline, as well as 5 mins of maximal pressure relief recovery. Peak pressure indices were calculated at the ischial and coccygeal sites.
    RESULTS:
    Ischial pressures monotonically decreased in response to increasing combinations of tilt and recline. Increments of 15 degrees of tilt did not produce significant differences under either recline angle, whereas increments of 25 degrees of tilt produced significant differences under both recline angles. Coccygeal pressures increased in response to the four smallest (of six) combinations of tilt and recline, whereas they decreased in response to the largest two combinations.
    CONCLUSIONS:
    Ischial pressures seemed to be redistributed to the coccyx in response to the four smallest angle combinations and redistributed to the back support in response to the two largest angle combinations. Future work should confirm this pressure redistribution to the back support and determine the back support locations of redistribution.
    Relation: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION;93(12):1019-30.
    Appears in Collections:[創意商品設計學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML367View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback