ASIA unversity:Item 310904400/7112
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 94286/110023 (86%)
造訪人次 : 21658298      線上人數 : 127
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/7112


    題名: 從政治思想之環境觀試論人性與文化價值之養成----以儒家思想為例
    作者: 許婷怡
    貢獻者: 國科會人文學研究中心
    日期: 2009-12-16
    上傳時間: 2010-01-08 04:04:09 (UTC+0)
    出版者: 亞洲大學外國語文學系
    摘要: For any people, country or society, while in the process of shaping up its values, a
    process which also includes establishing common standards used to differentiate between
    right and wrong and good and evil, the most important factor that needs evaluation is the
    common shared environment. This is especially true in cases where major environmental
    factors and conditions such as climate, resources, population and external threats, among
    others, could potentially influence survival or safety. Naturally these major factors require
    evaluation from a long term perspective. It is also important to adopt these common
    standards as a foundation to fall back on during the formation of the determining factors
    for commonly accepted standards of right and wrong and good and evil. In the passive
    sense, these major background factors are adopted for common preventative purposes or
    for protection; in the proactive sense, they are mutually and effectively used in the pursuit
    of inspired values which exploit these standards as the basis for a higher meaning.
    The background factors that are decisive or have the impact of shaping and forming
    the value system for a cultural entity could be infinite in number; nonetheless, they can be
    dichotomized into scenarios or conditions described as either “adequate” or “inadequate”,
    “poor” or “rich”, “safe” or “unsafe” and “serious” or “inconsequential”. In concrete terms,
    there are sufficient or insufficient factors that affect overall living or are overall either
    safe or unsafe. In some cases, the answers are positive, in other words, living basics are
    sufficient as well as safe, and in this situation, what should be focused on should be a
    matter of distribution. Questions as to whether the distribution is fair or not, methods by
    which distribution occurs, and how to set up a firm distribution system or architecture
    become important and should be of concern. Thus, in this environmental context, for any
    people, nation or society, the cultural value system that they formulate should be
    buttressed by a set of fair distribution values and systems of thinking. The cultural value
    system from the west is a product of the evolution of this kind of environmental
    background.This paper is focused on how Confucian ethico-political thought shaped from
    environmental Perspective—according to the analysis from the cultural essence and the
    functionality of politics. I will start by discussing the relation between the environment
    and the Confucian values formed in ancient China, and also explain how Confucian
    specific environment-value theory is different from the perspective of the modern
    Western idea of “environmental determinism”. Then I will further discuss why traditional
    Chinese politicians adopted these collective values of “non-individualism”,
    “non-materialism” and “non-sensationalism” to seek solution to the problems that they
    faced.
    關聯: 2009第三屆『全球化』與華語文敘述國際學術研討會 2009-12-16~19:371-372
    顯示於類別:[外國語文學系] 會議論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    310904400-7112 .doc30KbMicrosoft Word312檢視/開啟


    在ASIAIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋