ASIA unversity:Item 310904400/5457
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 94286/110023 (86%)
造访人次 : 21710460      在线人数 : 366
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    ASIA unversity > 管理學院 > 財經法律學系 > 會議論文 >  Item 310904400/5457


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/5457


    题名: 我國刑事DNA資料庫之建立與隱私權之探討
    作者: 唐淑美
    贡献者: 亞洲大學財經法律學系
    关键词: DNA database;DNA Sampling Act;The Prevention of Sexual Abuse Act in 2000Article 205-1 of the Criminal Procedure Law
    日期: 2007-12-17
    上传时间: 2009-12-10 03:07:17 (UTC+0)
    出版者: 亞洲大學財經法律學系
    摘要: Over the past decade, forensic DNA databases have become important government tools in the fight against crime. The national DNA database in Taiwan was established by applying the DNA Sampling Act and the Prevention of Sexual Abuse Act in 2000. The purpose of the above two acts are to maintain people’s safety, to assist in the judicial identification of persons, to assist in tracking down missing persons, determine biological fatherhood, enhance the effectiveness of crime investigators and to more effectively prevent sexual offences. The competent authority follows the two laws to collect DNA samples from sexual and serious offences. Article 205-1 of the Criminal Procedure Law in Taiwan defines bodily evidence as including any secretion, blood, hair or other tissue samples, but it does not define how to perform DNA sampling. According to the provision of this detailed DNA Sampling Act, Article 5, when DNA sampling is performed, priority should be given to blood samples first, then saliva, and finally hair sample. This lack of distinguishing in the law between intimate, substantial bodily search and non-intimate, minimal or non-bodily search for DNA evidence recovery presents serious human rights problems concerning privacy, confidentiality, and informed consent. In the case of adultery, intimate samples such as vaginal swabs were taken without the consent of the suspect, based on the grounds of “knowing the person suspected of committing the crime”, having seriously compromised the right of privacy. Such violation of human rights should only be undertaken in cases of much more serious crimes.
    關聯: 21世紀法學新趨勢國際研討會 2007-12-17
    显示于类别:[財經法律學系] 會議論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在ASIAIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈