| Abstract: | This study is to be for the purpose of discussing the problems caused by the fact that the current government employees? efficiency evaluation system has become such a formality for a long time that it hasn?t been able to fully reflect the real working performance. In that case, the great cognitive differences have emerged among the organization members. Their different cognitive attitudes also have an impact on their organization climate and commitment. In order to analyze their relevance, theory discussion and documentary investigation will be made.
Based on both dimensions of procedure and distribution fairness, this article is meant to study the effects, the relevance, and the working environments. The effects which organization members? cognition has on the three variations of organization commitment-diligence, value, working steadiness, are easily found out. The relevance to working properties, efficiency reward, organization conflicts colleague relationship is clearly outlined. How different working environments influence the organization members and how different environments make different behavior models, leading to different organization climate will be discussed in this study.
In the process of the study, it has been discovered that efficiency evaluation is closely-related to its members? attitudes, behavior, and values, no matter what rewarding results it may achieve. There are still many keys factors contributing to fair efficiency evaluation .Wether they are about procedure or distribution fairness, all have a positive influence on working steadiness, diligence, value, commitment, further helping with the promotion of belonging and identification senses , maintaining good relationship among its members. This kind of fairness will lead the members to the positive interaction with their working environments.
It is expected that the authorities concerned will get a better understanding of how important the fair efficiency evaluation is, emphasize its effects on the development of the organization, and furthermore, bring forth the concrete and constructive reform suggestions, as the guideline for the amendments to the government employees? efficiency evaluation system. |
