English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94286/110023 (86%)
Visitors : 21701759      Online Users : 499
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/3554


    Title: The Priority of Public Affairs Emplemented by Taichung Country
    Authors: Chung-Yi Lin
    Contributors: Department of Business Administration
    Keywords: Taichung county;County public affairs;Priority;Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-11-17 11:17:32 (UTC+0)
    Publisher: Asia University
    Abstract: This paper mainly discusses the priority of public affairs in Taichung county. The literature review was used to establish the hierarchy of county public affairs. The questionnaire was designed according to analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The leading members and councilors in different level of governments were chosen to realize the weight of six major hierarchies including society security, health care, social welfare, education/culture, environmental protection and government administration. The findings are shown as follows.
    1. The six major hierarchies in Taichung county were in the order: society security, health care, social welfare, education/culture, environmental protection and government administration.
    2.In the major hierarchy of social security, the priorities were in the order: security,
    evacuation, road maintenance, traffic establishment and labor?s safety and health.
    3.In the major hierarchy of health care, the priorities were in the order: food sanitation, disease control, national health insurance, medical quality management and health propaganda.
    4.In the major hierarchy of social welfare, the priorities were in the order: social assistance, woman and children?s welfare, aging people?s welfare, labor?s welfare and welfare for mentally and physical disabled people.
    5.In the major hierarchy of education and culture, the priorities were in the order: primary education, special education, social education, heritage conservation and maintenance and art promotion.
    6.In the major hierarchy of environmental protection, the priorities were in the order: air and noise quality, solid waste management, nature and soil conservation, park management and recreation and tour.
    7.In the major hierarchy of government executive, the priorities were in the order: urban and rural plants, industrial development, county finance management and information services.
    Appears in Collections:[經營管理學系 ] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown352View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback