English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94286/110023 (86%)
Visitors : 21674473      Online Users : 529
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/3452


    Title: Research of the Leadership Style of High School Physical Education Specializing Class Teacher and Student Attitude toward Learning
    Authors: Peng Ya Lan
    Contributors: Department of Business Administration
    Keywords: High school Physical Education Specializing class;Teacher;Leader;Leadership style;Learning attitude
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-11-17 11:17:06 (UTC+0)
    Publisher: Asia University
    Abstract: The purpose of this research is to understand the relationship between teacher?s leadership style and students? attitudes toward learning in high school?s Physical Education (P.E.) specializing class. From 48 high schools with P.E specializing class through out the domestic, classify them by regions into northern, center, southern and eastern. Then, select 2 high schools from each region and select in total of 495 students from all grades as the objects of study. The researcher hopes to understand the relationship between the P.E. specializing class teachers? different leadership styles and the students? attitude towards learning.
    The research method is using surveys, which are titled ?Teacher?s Leadership Style Measuring Chart? and ?Student?s Learning Attitude Measuring Chart.? The gathered data will go through the ANOVA, Scheffe? Method?etc. The results showed that:
    1. Under the ?High Proposing High Concern? leadership style, students? learning attitude is obviously higher than other 3 leadership styles (which are ?High Proposing Low Concern,? ?Low Proposing High Concern? and ?Low Proposing Low concern?).
    2. Students under ?High Proposing Low Concern? leadership have better learning attitude toward students under ?Low Proposing High Concern? leadership style.
    3. In the ?Attitude toward Teacher? measuring chart, students? attitude toward teacher under ?Low Proposing Low concern? leadership style is obliviously worse than the students under the other 3 leadership styles (which are ?High Proposing High Concern,? ?High Proposing Low Concern? and ?Low Proposing High Concern.?).
    Base on the results of this research, the researcher advised that high school P.E. specializing class teachers should lead their students with ?High Proposing High Concern? leadership style in order to set up students? fine learning attitude.
    Appears in Collections:[經營管理學系 ] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown495View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback