English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94286/110023 (86%)
Visitors : 21695353      Online Users : 577
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/3327


    Title: Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Traditional Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Authors: Fu-Tsai Chiang
    Contributors: Department of Healthcare Administration/Healthcare Division
    Keywords: minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty;traditional total knee arthroplasty;knee society scores;knee varus;valgus;flexion contracture
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2009-11-17 11:12:39 (UTC+0)
    Publisher: Asia University
    Abstract: Total knee arthroplasty was an effectiveness method for treatment the severe osteoarthritis of knee which has been approved and accepted by the orthopedic community. This technique has been developed more than thirty years and the clinical results have been followed up over twenty years and reliable by the orthopedic doctors. But postoperative pain and long period of recovery times and rehabilitation program were the major problems of the traditional total knee arthroplasty. There has been recent attention concerning minimally invasive technique for knee arthroplasty. Reviewing the relative articles, the surgical criterias were limited to knee varus < 10 degree or valgus < 15 degree and flexion contracture < 10 degree. It is not clear whether these complicated technique can be reproduced to knee varus <10 degree, or valgus < 15 degree and flexion contracture 10 to 15 degree.
    This prospective study was carried out under the particular criteria to assess safety, satisfaction and efficacy of a minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty comparison to traditional total knee arthroplasty. The study consisted of 48 knees, including 25 knees receiving traditional procedure and 23 knees receiving minimally invasive procedure.
    The results revealed that the mean skin length, mean total blood loss, mean hospital staying in the minimally invasive group were shorter than the traditional group and statistic significantly. But the mean operation time was longer (P<0.05) in the minimally invasive group. There were one partial popliteal tendon injury and two tibial component mildly internal rotation in the minimally invasive group. The above complications did not affect the finally clinical results. The early mean knee society scores, including objective and functional scores, minimally invasive group was better than traditional group but the difference got closely after 12 weeks postoperation and similar results were found at 6 months and 12 months following up postoperation. The satisfaction of both groups were similar after one year postoperation. The residual flexion contracture of knee was higher in minimally invasive group, but the p value > 0.05 and no statistic significantly. Most of the cases were shorter and obesity patient (body weight > 80kg). In this study, minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty showed less total blood loss, shorter hospital staying, quickly early range of motion and similar complication rate to traditional total knee arthroplasty. In summary, under the limited criterias, minimally invasive technique could be safety reproducible and created functional satisfaction.
    But this technique should need longer period to follow its clinical results.
    Appears in Collections:[健康管理組] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown514View/Open
    3327.doc26KbMicrosoft Word211View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback