ASIA unversity:Item 310904400/17858
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94286/110023 (86%)
Visitors : 21712454      Online Users : 135
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/17858


    Title: Exploration of long-term care institution managers’ perceptions of institutional indoor environment quality and ease of administration
    Authors: 謝嫣娉;Hsieh, Yen Ping;Lin, Chia Ching;黃英家;Huang, Ying Chia
    Contributors: 健康產業管理學系
    Keywords: "indoor environment quality;long-term care institution;long-term care institution director;lighting;ventilation;sound"
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2012-11-26 04:04:33 (UTC+0)
    Abstract: This study investigated the level of management's perception of the importance of indoor environment indicators at long-term care facilities as well as the differences between the level of perceived importance and the level of implementation. This study also analyzed the indicators for improving indoor environments. This study selected Taiwanese long-term care facility managers as its subjects to whom questionnaires were distributed by mail Descriptive statistics, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and an importance-performance analysis were used to conduct analyses on the data retrieved from the questionnaires. The results indicate that, of the indoor environment indicators of four facility spaces, bedrooms had the highest perceived level of importance. The lounge was the easiest space in which to implement the indicators. Differences were found between the perceived level of importance and the level of implementation for six of the indoor environment indicators of the four facility spaces. In these four spaces, the ventilation indicator was the most important, whereas implementing the temperature and humidity indicators was the most difficult. The highest priority for indicator improvement was given to the temperature in the bedrooms and bathrooms, whereas control over temperature, humidity, and sound had a low priority. The indicators seen as requiring continuous maintenance were lighting and ventilation. Facility managers had a high level of awareness and competence in implementing the ventilation indicator. However, although they were aware of the importance of the temperature, humidity, and sound indicators, their implementation was difficult, suggesting that they needed to be improved.
    Relation: The Journal of Long Term Home Health Care, 13(3):121-133.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Healthcare Administration] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML293View/Open
    out.pdf248KbAdobe PDF223View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback