ASIA unversity:Item 310904400/17845
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 94286/110023 (86%)
造访人次 : 21715148      在线人数 : 161
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/17845


    题名: Meta-analysis: Comparison of F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography and Bone Scintigraphy in the Detection of Bone Metastasis in Patients with Lung Cancer
    作者: Ming-Che Chang;Jin-Hua Chen;Ji-An Liang;Cheng-Chieh Lin;Kuang-Tao Yang;Kai-Yuan Cheng;Jun-Jun Yeh;Chia-Hung Kao
    贡献者: 健康產業管理學系
    关键词: Lung cancer;bone scan;bone scintigraphy;FDG-PET;bone metastasis
    日期: 2012
    上传时间: 2012-11-26 04:04:23 (UTC+0)
    摘要: RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES:
    The aim of this review was to evaluate the diagnostic properties of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy in the detection of osseous metastases in patients with lung cancer.
    MATERIALS AND METHODS:
    MEDLINE was searched for relevant original articles published between January 1995 and August 2010. Inclusion criteria were as follows: FDG-PET or PET/CT and bone scintigraphy was carried out to detect bone metastases in patients with lung cancer, sufficient data were presented to construct a 2 × 2 contingency table, and histopathologic analysis and/or close clinical and imaging follow-up and/or radiographic confirmation by multiple imaging modalities was used as the reference standard. Two reviewers independently extracted data related to research design, sample size, imaging techniques, technical characteristics, reference standards, methods of imaging interpretation, and totals of true-positives, false-positives, true-negatives, and false-negatives. Stata was used to obtain per patient and per lesion pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios, and areas under summary receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated.
    RESULTS:
    The pooled patient-based sensitivity of FDG-PET or PET/CT was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.96), specificity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), and the AUC was 0.94. The pooled sensitivity of bone scans was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.79-0.93), specificity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.62-0.92), and the AUC was 0.91. The pooled lesion-based sensitivity of FDG-PET or PET/CT was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.84-0.97), specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.80-0.96), and the AUC was 0.97. The pooled sensitivity of bone scans was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.87-0.95), specificity was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.09-0.95), and the AUC was 0.92.
    CONCLUSIONS:
    Although FDG-PET or PET/CT has higher sensitivity and specificity than bone scintigraphy, further research with a less biased design is needed to determine the most efficacious imaging modality for the detection of metastatic lung cancer.
    關聯: ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 19(3):349-357.
    显示于类别:[健康產業管理學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML386检视/开启


    在ASIAIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈