English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94286/110023 (86%)
Visitors : 21654798      Online Users : 355
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/17744


    Title: A National Survey of Physicians Attitudes toward Protecting Human Research Participants in Taiwan
    Authors: Shih), 石曜堂(Yaw-Tang
    Contributors: 健康產業管理學系
    Keywords: Human Research Participants Protection;Ethical Review;Informed Consent;Physicians;Attitude;Behavior.
    Date: 2004
    Issue Date: 2012-11-26 04:03:04 (UTC+0)
    Abstract: "To understand the attitudes, awareness, subjective norms and intention of physicians toward human research participant protection (HRPP), we surveyed 2,425 physicians between September 2000 and January 2001 in a cross-sectional survey of 11 medical centers and medical school hospitals in Taiwan. Response rate was 81%. Physicians' attitudes, awareness, subjective norms and intention to comply with HRPP requirements were measured via a self-administered questionnaire. We found that while 90% of respondents had never heard of IRB, Nuremberg Code, Declaration of Helsinki, Belmont Report, U.R.M.S.B.J., or JIRB, more than 78% of total respondents showed strong response in 4 items of behavioral belief about the significance of HRPP in intervention studies. Around 22% did not recognize IRB reviews as important for those intervention studies not regulated by the existing Medical Care Act. In the measure of physicians' beliefs toward HRPP as related to interaction studies, over 59% favored requirements that research participants be well informed and that informed consent be obtained. Only 43% believed an IRB review was unimportant in conducting an interaction study. Physicians report that they place more attention on selecting patients carefully than on fully informing research participants, obtaining informed consent or submitting a proposal for IRB review. Based on our regression results, physicians' attitudes were highly correlated with their intent to be involved in IRB reviewed process.
    The results of our study suggest that physicians in Taiwan are not now generally aware of HRPP. Attitudes about protecting research participants varied among different types of studies. This consistent lack of awareness combined with a lack of official regulation shows that the HRPP system in Taiwan may not now be able to adequately protect the safety and rights of human research subjects. In addition, our evidence shows that by changing physicians' attitudes towards HRPP, we may accelerate progress in developing, improving, and implementing HRPP."
    Relation: Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics
    Appears in Collections:[健康產業管理學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML219View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback