ASIA unversity:Item 310904400/17601
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 94286/110023 (86%)
造访人次 : 21692154      在线人数 : 741
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    ASIA unversity > 管理學院 > 財務金融學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 310904400/17601


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/17601


    题名: A comparison of alternative expected return estimation models for event studies: A simulation approach
    作者: 劉永欽;Liu, Yong-Chin
    贡献者: 財務金融學系
    关键词: GARCH ; Event Study ; Three-Factor Model 3FM ; Four-Factor Model 4FM ; Jensen's Performance Index ; GARCH
    日期: 2010-03
    上传时间: 2012-11-26 02:37:37 (UTC+0)
    摘要: This paper compares the performance of four expected return estimation models-the MM, CAPM, 3FM, and 4FM-separately using OLS estimator, GARCH model, and mix of OLS and GARCH-for finding AR in traditional short-horizon event study, using simulation experiments. Moreover, Jensen's performance index is employed to evaluate the last three models. The conclusions are that under a traditional framework, OLS is not inferior to the other complex estimators. 3FM and 4FM somewhat dominate the MM and CAPM because of lower estimation bias and slightly smaller Type I error, though the last two models' performance is already satisfactory. Under Jensen's performance index, CAPM is superior to 3FM and 4FM due to lower Type I error and higher power. Both event-study frameworks have weak power in experiencing uncertain event day and/or tiny AR.
    關聯: 亞太經濟管理評論
    显示于类别:[財務金融學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML569检视/开启


    在ASIAIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈