ASIA unversity:Item 310904400/17576
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94286/110023 (86%)
Visitors : 21655215      Online Users : 457
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/17576


    Title: Which IC is more important?A life-cycle perspective
    Authors: 梁瓊如;Liang, Chiung-Ju;林盈利;Lin, Ying-Li
    Contributors: 財務金融學系
    Keywords: Intellectual capital, Taiwan
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2012-11-26 02:37:17 (UTC+0)
    Abstract: "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate value-relevant information provided by intellectual capital (IC) beyond financial performance under different life-cycle stages.

    Design/methodology/approach – The life-cycle classification method and the residual income model are used to examine the information technology industry.

    Findings – The empirical results show that the value-relevant information provided by IC under the growth, maturing, and stagnant stages can be ranked in order (from high to low) of custom, innovation, process, and human capital. Specifically, the empirical results indicate that overall IC provided the most value-relevant information in the stagnant stage and the lowest value-relevant information in the growth stage.

    Research limitations/implications – This paper reveals that evaluating the company market value merely by financial performance involves a number of limitations, thereby requiring IC to supplement the process. The internet downturn in the mid-2000s might have likewise affected the categorization of life-cycle stages and the value-relevant information provided by intellectual capital during the “bubble” period.

    Practical implications – Managers and investors should not merely focus on financial performance as the main value-relevant information, but a thorough review of IC in different life-cycle stages should be made in order to avoid making incorrect decisions.

    Originality/value – This paper contributes to the existing literature by exploring customer, process, innovation, and human capital which, significantly, have different value-relevant information in different life-cycle stages."
    Relation: Journal of Intellectual Capital
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Finance] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML392View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback