A Psychometric Analysis of the Chinese Version of Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (CMPS): Reliability and Validity.

ASIA unversity > 醫學暨健康學院 > 心理學系 > 期刊論文 > Item 310904400/15870

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/15870

题名:	A Psychometric Analysis of the Chinese Version of Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (CMPS): Reliability and Validity.
作者:	柯慧貞;jennyko;Huei-Chen Ko;林旻沛;Lin, Min-Pei;陳正嘉;Cheng-Chia Chen;周鉦翔;Cheng-Hsiang Chou;陳廣圻;Kuang-Chi Chen
贡献者:	心理學系
日期:	2010
上传时间:	2012-11-23 07:03:33 (UTC+0)
摘要:	研究目的：本研究旨在修訂中文版多向度完美主義量表，並進行信效度分析；也驗證Frost的六向度完美主義建構與二因素次層結構。根據文獻分析，本研究假設「過度在乎錯誤」、「對行動的懷疑」、「父母批評」及「父母期望」分量表分數，與強迫症狀或憂鬱症狀量尺分數呈低度相關；「個人標準」分量表分數與憂鬱症狀分數及強迫症狀量尺分數呈正相關；而「組織性」分量表分數與憂鬱症狀或強迫症狀分數則無關；並據此進行量表之效標效度分析。研究方法：透過分層叢集取樣，由南區大專校院大學生抽樣有效樣本2,190名；自填中文版多向度完美主義量表、身心健康評估量表。研究結果：全量表內部一致性為.938，分量表內部一致性介於.736~.903，六向度建構及二次層因素建構適配度指標良好，量表與各效標間關係亦支持上述假設。研究結論：中文版多向度完美主義量表具良好之信度、效標關聯效度，並支持Frost的六向度完美主義建構與二因素次層結構模型。 Purpose: The goals of this study were to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (CMPS), to examine the six-dimensional model of perfectionism with two second-order factors as proposed by Frost, and to explore the relationships among the six dimensions, two second-order factors, depressive symptoms, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Based on a literature review, the following hypotheses were examined: the subscale scores on "Concern over Mistakes", "Doubting of Action", "Parental Expectation", and "Parental Criticism" had positive relationships with both the depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptom scores; the "Personal Standard" subscale score had a weak relationship with the depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptoms scores; the "Organization" subscale score was not correlated with either depressive or obsessive-compulsive symptom scores. Methods: Using stratified and cluster sampling, a total of 2,190 college students (mean age=19.718) were recruited from southern Taiwan and administered the CMPS, Ko Depression Inventory, and Symptoms Check List-90-R. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was .938 for the CMPS and ranged within between .736 and .903 for the subscales. Moreover, the six-dimensional model of perfectionism with two-second order factors had good model-fit evaluations. In addition, the "Concern over Mistakes", "Doubting of Action", "Parental Expectation", and "Parental Criticism" subscales had positive relationships with the depressive symptom and obsessive-compulsive symptom scores. The "Personal Standard" subscale score had weak relationships with the depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptoms scores. The "Organization" subscale score was not correlated with either depressive or obsessive-compulsive symptom scores. Results supported all hypotheses. We also found that males had higher scores than females on "Parental Expectation" and "Doubting of Action". Conclusions: The CMPS is a reliable and valid measurement of perfectionism. Moreover, Frost's six-dimensional model of perfectionism with two second-order structures was supported.
關聯:	中華心理衛生學刊 / Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 24(1):61-96.
显示于类别:	[心理學系] 期刊論文

文件中的档案:

档案	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html	0Kb	Unknown	577	检视/开启

在ASIAIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

数据加载中.....