English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94286/110023 (86%)
Visitors : 21650820      Online Users : 517
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    ASIA unversity > 護理學院 > 學士後護理學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 310904400/115429


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/115429


    Title: Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Cohen–Mansfield Agitation Inventory-Short Form in Assessing Agitated Behavior
    Authors: Feng-Ching, S;Sun, Feng-Ching;林麗嬋;Lin, Li-Chan;Cha, Shu-Chen;李慧琦;Li, Hui-Chi;Ch, Chia-Hsin;Cheng, Chia-Hsin;Huan, Ling-Ya;Huang, Ling-Ya
    Contributors: 護理學院學士後護理學系
    Keywords: Cohen–Mansfield Agitation Inventory;agitated behaviors;dementia;reliability;validity.
    Date: 2022-08-01
    Issue Date: 2023-03-29 02:22:59 (UTC+0)
    Publisher: 亞洲大學
    Abstract: Background: Patients with dementia often present agitated behaviors. The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory-short form (CMAI-SF) is one of the most widely used instruments to evaluate agitated behaviors that affect patients' quality of life and impose burden on caregivers. However, there is no simplified Chinese version of the CMAI-SF (C-CMAI-SF) in clinical settings.

    Purpose: This study aimed to develop a Chinese version of the C-CMAI-SF and examine its validity and reliability.

    Methods: This cross-sectional study included three phases. In Phase I, the original CMAI-SF was translated to Chinese. In Phase II, experts were invited to examine the content validity index (CVI). Phase III was conducted to test the validity and reliability of the C-CMAI-SF.

    Results: The scale showed good validity and reliability with a scale-level CVI of 0.89, Cronbach's alpha (measure of internal consistency) of 0.874, and test-retest correlation coefficient of 0.902 (for 257 individuals). Using factor analysis, three factors were identified. Regarding concurrent validity, the C-CMAI-SF score was correlated with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (agitation aggression subscale) and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (agitation subscale).

    Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the C-CMAI-SF is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating agitated behaviors in people with dementia.

    Relevance to clinical practice: The C-CMAI-SF is an easy and quick tool used to identify and evaluate agitated behaviors in busy clinical settings.
    Appears in Collections:[學士後護理學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML126View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback