ASIA unversity:Item 310904400/115168
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 94286/110023 (86%)
造訪人次 : 21700425      線上人數 : 533
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    ASIA unversity > 管理學院 > 財經法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 310904400/115168


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/115168


    題名: 從優惠性差別待遇談台灣原住民就業保障
    作者: 陳素娟;Su Juan, Chen;陸敏清;Ming Chin, Lu
    貢獻者: 管理學院財經法律學系
    關鍵詞: 優惠性差別待遇 ; 工作權 ; 原住民族工作保障法 ; 比例進用
    ; Affirmative Action ; the Protection of Right to Work ; Indigenous Peoples Employment Rights Protection Act ; Proportional Recruitment
    日期: 2022-03-01
    上傳時間: 2023-03-29
    出版者: 亞洲大學
    摘要: 臺灣組成份子相當多元,除了原住民族之外,尚有來自於各地之移民與新住民。面對不同族群之文化差異,往往族群間之問題,攸關社會秩序之穩定與發展。為此,如何兼顧不同族群權益,考驗著國家統治正當性的基礎。憲法增修條文第10條第11項明文要求國家「肯定多元文化」,然而於社會發展過程中,相關政策的推動而導致原住民族於生活、經濟與既有文化受到衝擊,甚至因族群偏見或歧視而產生相對剝奪感。面對此等不利處境,如何提昇其社會、經濟地位以符合憲法上肯定多元文化之預設?國家勢必要有更積極之作為。而在保護原住民族之脈絡下,憲法增修條文第10條第12項更要求國家應「保障扶助並促其發展」,進而國家須透過具體建制因應之。考量工作乃促進自立發展之關鍵,因此保障就業即成為維繫原住民族地位並促進其發展之關鍵。然而該如何立論並賦予其正當性?本文藉由「優惠性差別待遇」(Affirmative action)概念進行探討,同時透過釋憲實務見解檢視現行法制相關規定,並從中思考如何強化對其之就業保障,積極落實前開憲法明文之要求。
    Equality is the basic Principle guaranteed by the Constitution. If there is a different treatment between races or people, we need to check if the treatment meets the requirement of the principle of equality. Indigenous peoples are equal in dignity and rights to other people. But from their special status, they still need different protection for their development and growth. It's considered that the practice of Indigenous People Employment Rights Protection Act gives advantage to indigenous people; due to the special regulations of the act, which results in the priority for indigenous people on employment. This article focuses on the issue of the right to work for protection of indigenous peoples under the concept of affirmative action. In order to understand the concept, this article observes the theory and constitutional interpretations No. 719. Under the context, it also compares with the development of affirmative action in the United Sates. Through the comparative analysis, this article provides some advice for legislation or law reform in the future.
    顯示於類別:[財經法律學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML231檢視/開啟


    在ASIAIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋