ASIA unversity:Item 310904400/115088
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94286/110023 (86%)
Visitors : 21654706      Online Users : 996
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/115088


    Title: Research on the Trusted Online Examination Systems
    Authors: 廖岳祥;Liao, Anthony Y. H.;謝玉英;Hsieh, Yu-Ying;Cheng-Ying, Ying Y;Yang, Cheng-Ying;黃明祥;Hwang, Min-Shiang
    Contributors: 資訊電機學院行動商務與多媒體應用學系
    Keywords: Learning Management Systems (LMS);Online Examination;Online Proctoring Techniques
    Date: 2022-05-01
    Issue Date: 2023-03-28 02:20:26 (UTC+0)
    Publisher: 亞洲大學
    Abstract: In recent years, due to the threat of the new crown
    pneumonia (Covid-19), to avoid cluster infections, the
    way of online teaching has rapidly formed a trend. To
    maintain the authenticity and fairness of exams, teachers
    in many colleges and universities have formulated various
    solutions for students cheating in online exams. Therefore, cheating methods and proctoring techniques have
    become the two most important issues in online teaching. This paper collects and analyzes relevant literature
    on online cheating and online proctoring techniques from
    2015 to 2022. We concluded that personal and environmental factors mainly influenced why students cheated.
    Most types of cheating are plagiarism, plagiarism, collusion, and imposter. Teachers do their best to prevent
    students from cheating. Electronic monitoring, authentication, and change assessment methods are the most
    common method. However, no matter which method is
    used, it cannot obtain satisfactory results. Other academics object to using technology or methods to control
    student exams. Return to the essence of education and
    cultivate talents who can manage themselves. Such arguments are not an immediate solution to the current problem of cheating on online exams. This paper synthesizes
    the opinions and practices of various works of literature
    and argues that adopting multiple evaluation methods is
    the closest approach to fairness and effectiveness. The
    essence of education is to guide value creation, cultivate
    ethical thinking, and acquire knowledge and ability. It is
    also necessary to rely on the advancement of information
    technology to improve the design of learning management
    systems (LMS) to break through the blind spots of current online exam cheating and proctoring techniques.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Applied Informatics and Multimedia] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML309View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback