現行認罪協商制度之研究

ASIAIR > College of Management > Department of Financial and Economic Law > Theses & dissertations > Item 310904400/113926

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/113926

Title:	現行認罪協商制度之研究 A STUDY ON THE CURRENT PLEA BARGAIN SYSTEM
Authors:	梁懿慧 Liang, Yi-Hui
Contributors:	財經法律學系
Keywords:	民主法治;認罪協商;兩極化刑事政策;修復式司法 Democracy and the Rule of Law;Plea Bargain;Polarization of Criminal Policy;Restorative Justice
Date:	2021-07-23
Issue Date:	2022-10-31 06:51:16 (UTC+0)
Publisher:	亞洲大學
Abstract:	摘要　　　　　　憲法明文五院機關所掌之職權，各有其司，得以在各體系中發揮其所能，畢盡其功，且不違背分寸，為人民盡忠職守，以收權力分立之充分彰顯。立法、行政、司法一直在國家與人民就審判之司法而言，終極判決之法院角色，除依法審判設身處地無不以人民之生命財產為最後之守護者外，行政機關之行政行為，也扮演著公正審慎用法、維護公共利益、及保護人民權益之地位。刑事訴訟法規範著程序正義，法律問題並非訴訟是唯一可行之選擇，犯罪涉及重大侵犯國家公共利益、危害社會治安之重罪，審以嚴格處置裁以隔絕社會之自由，緩和轉向政策以可替代性或教育性處遇回復社會生活。具有反覆危險性犯罪行為者處之保安處分。並融入社會調和元素之修復式司法。尚有另類選擇之認罪協商機制。刑法之遏阻犯罪之預防作用及其謙抑性，因社會科層組織化，行政權限裁處，基於整體社會資源配置及社會防衛立場，免於訟爭，設有訴訟外之調解、緩和政策之轉向處遇、修復式司法調和、審理程序中之認罪協商，預防制定法本身、訴訟行為可能產生之法律風險，及社會成本之經濟效益，國家法治目的所欲達到之安定性，訴訟外解決紛爭之預防司法，發展另一面保障人民救濟途徑之功能。 ABSTRACTThe constitution has elaborated the distinct charge of the Five Yuan, each can exert its capability without breaching principles, function for the people, and fully embody the doctrine of the separation of powers. The legislation, the administration, and the jurisdiction have long played the roles between the state and the people, such as the court trial as the ultimate verdict of the jurisdiction. In addition to trial-by-legislature, putting in one’s place, and serving as the final guardian of the property of the people, the administrative behavior of the administration authority also bears the status of utilizing the law justly and prudently, maintains public interest, and protects the rights and interests of people. The Criminal Procedure Law regulates the procedural justice; filing a lawsuit is not the sole feasible choice of legal problems. If a crime involves with severe infringement upon national public interest or endangering social security, the court will make a severe verdict and deprive the freedom of the accused or turn to alternative and educational treatment to help the accused return to social life. If the accused have the risk of repetitive dangerous criminal behaviors, the court will make a ruling of rehabilitative measures and fuse restorative justice with elements of social reconciliation. Therefore, there comes the alternative plea bargain system. The Criminal Law has its prevention effects against crimes and its humility. With the social bureaucracy, the administrative discretion, based on the holistic allocation of social resources and the standpoint of social defense, refraining from litigation, set up mediation, diversion treatment, the reconciliation of restorative justice, and the plea bargain in the procedure of trials outside of lawsuit, to prevent the legal risks of enacting laws, the possible risks of legal actions, and the economic efficiencies of social cost, along with the goal of stability and a state ruled by law, a preventive jurisdiction that resolves conflicts outside of lawsuit, developing the other aspect of functions of guaranteeing access to relief for the people.
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Financial and Economic Law] Theses & dissertations

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	70	View/Open

Loading...