行動網路電召車之規制-印尼與臺灣競爭政策之比較研究

ASIA unversity > 管理學院 > 財經法律學系 > 博碩士論文 > Item 310904400/113923

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/113923

题名:	行動網路電召車之規制-印尼與臺灣競爭政策之比較研究 Regulating Internet-Based E-hailing: Competition Policy Comparison between Indonesia and Taiwan
作者:	Anggriawan, Rizaldy Anggriawan, Rizaldy
贡献者:	財經法律學系
关键词:	競爭;掠奪性定價;網路運輸服務 Competition;Predatory Pricing;Online Transportation
日期:	2021-07-15
上传时间:	2022-10-31 06:51:05 (UTC+0)
出版者:	亞洲大學
摘要:	透過行動網路電召服務之共乘概念的出現，亦即透過電腦、手機或其他網路工具服務來獲取車輛運輸服務，被視為彌平公共運輸需求與降低車輛數目之選項。然而，儘管其具有急速的成長與正面的效應，隨之而來在印尼與臺灣業也帶來許多問題。許多跡象顯示印尼行動電召車服務公司正在進行折扣戰。在印尼潛在的不公平商業競爭存在於兩家摩托計程車公司Gojek以及Grab 的掠奪性定價，透過及其可能之低行銷價格來達成其削減競爭者業務之企圖，結果會是贏者將獨占市場而影響市場之健康生態。而Uber在台灣也面臨許多法律遵循之問題。Uber曾拒絕登記為計程車服務業，聲稱其僅為行動應用程式公司。本論文研究競爭法是否有益於行動電召車業者，以及印尼與台灣競爭政策如何創造出一個供所有業者公平競爭之場域。本論文研究指出印尼的行動電召車服務產業正面臨威脅，因為業者正陷於燒錢的競爭惡習。相較之下，台灣政府已經成功地透過其嚴格管控，令Uber被迫順應在地規制，並與政府合作，成功處理Uber帶來的威脅，並使民眾能享有Uber之服務。兩國採用之法制與政策手段之比較，相信能為印尼帶來正面之研究效益。 The emergence of ride-sharing concept through the e-hailing application is considered as a form of alternative to filling the gap on the demand for public transportation as well as reducing the number of vehicles on the road. E-hailing is the process of requesting a transportation vehicle by means of computers, cell phones or other electronic devices. Unfortunately, despite the massive growth of e-hailing transportation and its positive impact in Indonesia and Taiwan, numerous issues have also appeared along with the growth of e-hailing. There are several indications that e-hailing companies are waging a discount, fare, and promotion wars. There is potential unfair business competition in Indonesia in the form of predatory pricing in the e-hailing motorcycle taxi industry (Ojol) which is participated by two market players namely Gojek and Grab. The mode is by applying promotion fare as low as possible with the intention to eliminate their competitors’ business in the relevant market. And as a result of that, the winner will be monopolizing the market and harming the ecosystem in it. While Uber operation in Taiwan also faced several issues with regards to the legal compliance. Uber refused to register as a Taxi Operator Company claiming that there is no need for them to do so because they are a mobile application-based company. The paper examines the questions on whether or not the competition law beneficial for the e-hailing industry? And, how successful has the Indonesian and Taiwan competition policy been in creating an equal playing field for all transportation industry parties? As the result of the paper, it shows that the existence of e-hailing industry in Indonesia is threatened. As the e-hailing companies are trapped in cash-burning practice. While Taiwanese government has successfully managed Uber due to its strict control. The company was forced to adapt and innovate and agreed to collaborate with approved rental car companies or the taxi industry to resume serving riders in Taiwan.
显示于类别:	[財經法律學系] 博碩士論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html		0Kb	HTML	172	检视/开启

在ASIAIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

数据加载中.....