English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94286/110023 (86%)
Visitors : 21687416      Online Users : 268
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    ASIA unversity > 管理學院 > 經營管理學系  > 博碩士論文 >  Item 310904400/111848


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/111848


    Title: 非線性輪廓描述的具有質量特徵的過程的供應商評估和選擇
    Supplier Evaluation and Selection for Processes with Quality Characteristics Described by Nonlinear Profiles
    Authors: 林凱庭
    HALIM, JESSICA KARTIKA DEVINA
    Contributors: 經營管理學系
    Keywords: 供應商評估和選擇;非線性配置文件;與最佳的多重比較;Bonferroni方法
    Supplier evaluation and selection;Nonlinear profiles;Multiple comparisons with the best;Bonferroni method
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-05-23 02:44:17 (UTC+0)
    Publisher: 亞洲大學
    Abstract: 研究目的 – 本文的目的是使用基於過程產量的方法提出供應商評估和選擇模型,其中質量由非線性輪廓描述。

    研究方式 – 本文提出了與最佳(MCB),差異測試統計和Bonferroni方法的多重比較,以評估和選擇最佳供應商。 此外,本研究還考慮了具有雙邊規格的非線性輪廓描述質量的過程。 進行模擬研究以找出選擇功率和所需的輪廓數。 所有程序都是用R語言編寫的。

    研究發現 – 該研究發現MCB的表現優於Bonferroni方法。 此外,當最佳供應商等於K / 2的上限時,MCB將具有最小功率,並且當僅存在一個最佳供應商時,Bonferroni方法將具有最小功率。 級別數量和配置文件數量都會對統計測試的功效產生影響。 所需的配置文件數量和臨界值列表,以方便決策者。

    獨創性與價值 – 所提出的方法可以幫助管理者或從業者以有效的方式評估和選擇具有所識別標準的最佳供應商。
    Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose supplier evaluation and selection model using the proposed method based on process yield where the quality is described by nonlinear profile.

    Methodology – This paper present multiple comparisons with the best (MCB), difference test statistics and the Bonferroni method to evaluate and select the best supplier. Furthermore, this study considers processes which quality is described by nonlinear profiles with two-sided specifications. Simulation study was conducted to find the selection power and the required number of profiles. All programs were written in R language.

    Findings – This study found that MCB performs better than the Bonferroni method. Additionally, MCB will have the least power when the best supplier is equal to the upper limit of K/2 and the Bonferroni method will have the least power when there is only one best supplier exists. Both the number of levels and the number of profiles will have an impact on the power of the statistical test. The required number of profiles and the critical value are tabulated for the convenience of decision makers.

    Originality/value – The proposed method can help managers or practitioners to evaluate and select the best suppliers with the identified criteria in an effective way.
    Appears in Collections:[經營管理學系 ] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML303View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback