| Abstract: | 米隆臨床多軸量表(Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory, MCMI)向來以具備人格理論基礎、操作簡單、施測時間短、可提供多元訊息、效度研究豐富、可跨文化使用等優勢聞名，這些特質讓它格外適合我國現有的醫療環境，因此本研究的主要目的在於探討中文化第三版MCMI(CMCMI-III)在台灣的適用性。研究步驟上分成預試與正式兩階段進行，研究者在預試和正式階段各自招募了50名「健康組」和101名「精神病患組」受試者，所有人員皆必須依序填寫CMCMI-III、基本人格量表(Basic Personality Inventory, BPI)、貝克憂鬱量表第二版(Beck Depression Inventory–II, BDI-II)、貝克焦慮量表(Beck Anxiety Inventory, BAI)、健康性格習慣量表(Health, Personality, and Habit Test, HPH)；「健康組」在間隔至少兩周後需接受CMCMI-III再測。分析數據顯示CMCMI-III擁有良好的內部一致性(平均Cronbach’s α = .71)及再測信度(平均 r = .65)。此外CMCMI-III裡有五個臨床症狀量尺(焦慮、雙相性：躁期、輕鬱、思考障礙症、重鬱)和九個人格障礙量尺(孤僻型、畏避型、憂鬱型、依賴型、自戀型、反社會型、思覺失調型、邊緣型、妄想型)和它們在用來擔任效標測驗(i.e., BPI, BDI-II, BAI, HPH)裡的建構(construct)對應量尺之間存在顯著相關，象徵這14個量尺在國內的建構效度獲得驗證，同時也為CMCMI-III在台使用的合理性提供了初步支持證據，並提供未來相關主題者做為文獻參考。
The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) has always known for its adventages such, as possessing the foundation of theories of personality, easy to operate, short conducting time, providing various information, plentiful studies on validity, and available in cross-culture. These features make it practically suitible for the clinical environment in our country. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to explore the application of The Chinese version of MCMI-III(CMCMI-III) in Taiwan.The study was divided as two pretrial and formal trial. Researchers recruited 50 subjects of “ healthy group” and 101 subjects of “mental illness group” in both pretrial and formal trial stage. All of them must take the tests of CMCMI-III, Basic Personality Inventory (BPI), Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the Health, Personality, and Habit Test (HPH) in order, the “healthy group” must take the CMCMI-III test again after at least two weeks. The analys data of CMCMI-III showed great internal consistency (average Cronbach’s α = .71) and test-retest reliability (average r = .65). Additionally, there were five sub-scales of clinical syndromes (Anxiety、Bipolar: Manic、Dysthymia、Thought Disorder、Major Depression) and nine sub-scales of personality disorders (Schizoid、Avoidant、Depressive、Dependent、Narcissistic、Antisocial、Schizotypal、Borderline、Paranoid) that were significantly correlated with the construct corresponding scales of the criterion-referenced test (i.e., BPI, BDI-II, BAI, HPH). It symbolized the construct validity of the 14 scales were proven domestically, meanwhile it also provided an initial supportive evidence for using the CMCMI-III rationally in Taiwan This study supplied as the reference for related-topic researchers in the future. |
